Wednesday, March 31, 2010

5 Ways in Which Christ is Experienced and Understood After the Resurrection

Jim has talked recently on the PleaseConvinceMe Podcast 140 and again in a listener email in Podcast 145 about how we can account for those episodes in the scripture in which Jesus' followers seem to have trouble identifying him after the resurrection. Jim also writes in depth about the encounter with Mary in the article Why Didn't Mary recognize the Resurrected Jesus?

The honesty and humility we see in the post-resurrection accounts is evidence of the credibility of the New Testament. John Witte Jr. add this insight in his article A Manifold Resurrection:

What is even more striking is how his followers consistently fail to recognize him, and, more importantly, the variety of ways in which God makes it possible for them to apprehend him.

Mary Magdalene, weeping outside the empty tomb, has to be called by name before she recognizes Christ. Before that, she thought he was a gardener.

Ten disciples, gathered in a room in sorrow and fear, need Christ to breathe his peace on them before they recognize him. Before that, they thought he was a ghost.

Two travelers from Emmaus walked with Christ and talked with him about salvation history all the way to their city, but recognized him only when he held up some bread and blessed it. Before that, they thought he was simply a learned traveler.

Thomas, the great doubter, wanted to put his fingers in the nail holes of the Cross and his hand in the pierced side of Christ before accepting him. Prior to that, he thought Christ was a fraud.

And Peter, that enigmatic rock of the church, recognized Christ only after he performed the miracle of filling Peter's nets with fish. Then Peter had to sit through a threefold cross-examination as to whether he really believed in the resurrected Lord whom he had just denied: "Simon Barjona, do you love me?" "Do you love me?" "Do you love me?"

In these Gospel accounts, we see five ways in which Christ is experienced and understood after the Resurrection: A calling by name. A delivery of peace. A sacramental vision. A physical encounter. A miracle and conversation with God. I see both a budding psychology and a budding ecclesiology at work in these passages.

The Gospels record these stories and encounters of the newly resurrected Christ, in part, for our spiritual comfort.

There is a little bit of Mary Magdalene in all of us: times when we swoon with pain and grief and need God's call to comfort us. There is a little bit of the Emmaus travelers in all of us: times when we talk idly about divine matters but see God only in the sublime simplicity of the sacrament. There is a little bit of the huddled disciples in all of us: times when our faith puts us in jeopardy and fear, and we need God's peace to be breathed on us. There is a little bit of Thomas in all of us: times that we are so overcome by doubt and skepticism that we need God's touch to assure and anchor us. And there is a little bit of Peter in all of us: times when we deny and betray our Lord and need a miracle to remind us of God's majesty or a divine conversation to move us to confess our faith unflinchingly.
HT: Christianity Today
Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

PleaseConvinceMe Podcast 145

A Triune Approach to Curing What Ails the Church

While many of us describe ourselves as Christians, few of us are able to articulate Christian Orthodoxy. Fewer and fewer Christians are Biblically literate and many Christians hold non-Biblical ideas about the nature of God, Jesus and Salvation. To make matter worse, most young Christians will walk away from Christianity in their college years and the Church is often more concerned about itself than the community around it. In this podcast, Jim describes a three-pronged approach to "Church life" that may help solve some of these problems.

Check out the podcast homepage for subscription information and archives.


Share/Bookmark

Monday, March 29, 2010

The Making of An Atheist

I was recently asked to review "The Making of An Atheist: How Immorality Leads to Unbelief " by James Spiegel, and I am happy to commend the book to you. I believe it to be an important addition to the case for the "Christian Worldview" and (now) the case for "Atheistic Belief". Spiegel clearly recognizes that he is articulating a Biblical hypothesis that will be controversial and "uncomfortable" for some; in fact, he might even expect folks like me (evidential apologists) to be most resistant to his premise. Spiegel proposes that the true cause of atheism is "“not at all a consequence of intellectual doubts. Such doubts are mere symptoms of the root cause – moral rebellion. For the atheist, the missing ingredient is not evidence but obedience (page 11)." Spiegel recognizes and affirms the Biblical claim that “Atheism is the suppression of truth by wickedness, the cognitive consequence of immorality. In short, it is sin that is the mother of unbelief (page 18)." Although I am an evidentialist, I understand the relationship between evidence and proof (as I have always described it), but before I respond to that particular issue, let me summarize the book in broad strokes:

Spiegel begins by reviewing the rational nature of the Christian Worldview. He re-articulates several classic evidential and philosophical lines of argument, and this short summary is satisfying, in and of itself. Spiegel is laying this foundation in order to illustrate that Christian truth claims are sufficiently rational, in light of the evidence. But if this is true, why do so many people reject the claims of Christianity? If Christianity is rational and evidentially supported, why would anyone reject the truth? Something else is clearly at work in the heart of the atheist.

Spiegel next provides three explanations for what is at work here: (1) The destructive or absent role of fathers in the lives of atheists (citing Paul Vitz's Faith of the Fatherless: The Psychology of Atheism), (2) The open and immoral lifestyles of those who reject the existence of God (citing Paul Johnson's Intellectuals and E. Michael Jones' Degenerate Moderns), and (3) The willful denial of atheists (citing the work of William James). Spiegel also cites a number of Biblical passages that affirm the role that immorality and willful denial play in the heart of man. In all of this, Spiegel argues that atheism is caused by a complex relationship between moral and psychological factors, rather than a perceived lack of evidence for God’s existence.

Spiegel concludes his book with a chapter on the "Blessings of Theism", exploring a number of benefits that arise from a belief in the existence of God, including the fact that the Christian worldview allows believers to be grounded in the truth with a path toward virtue and "cognitive health", and the objective ability of Christian Theism to categorize good and evil, right and wrong.

Spiegel has engaged a number of bloggers in the process of reviewing this book. You can visit his BLOG TOUR, website and blog to get an idea of what others are saying. I noticed that those who are inclined to take a presuppositional view of apologetics were most satisfied by the book and wrote that it confirmed their view that evidentialism seems to miss the real problem with atheists. The presuppositionalist argues that humans are simply unable to choose the truth of Christianity unless God first works in their heart to remove the hostility that they hold toward Him. Until this occurs, humans simply continue to wallow in their rebellion, willfully denying the obvious truth of theism. For many presuppositionalists, the path to accepting the truth of Christianity has nothing at all to do with the evidence. Spiegel's book will most certainly find a home in the presuppositional library. But as an evidentialist, I too affirm the truth of Spiegel's observations.

The relationship between evidence and belief is often confusing, but I've tried to explain it in an article entitled, How the Evidence Becomes Proof. As an evidentialist, I recognize that all of us begin with an enmity toward God and a predisposition toward immorality and self gratification that feeds our willful denial of God's existence. God must remove this barrier before we can ever see the evidence clearly. But this does not mitigate the role that evidence plays at all. Once the barrier has been removed, once the wall has been torn down, it is the evidence that will draw us to Jesus. The Christian faith is an evidential faith. God repeatedly takes the time to reveal Himself to us evidentially in the Gospels and in the created universe in which we live. Jesus provided the world with evidence (John 14:11), God sees the resurrection as a key piece of evidence (Acts 17:30), Jesus provided the disciples with many "convincing proofs" (Acts 1:2-3), and Paul reasoned with evidence after Jesus ascended (Acts 17:2). God removes the barrier, you and I have the opportunity to provide the evidence.

I found Spiegel's book to be a concise, engaging and thoughtful read. I recommend it to you and I hope it will get you thinking about the relationship between evidence and faith.
Share/Bookmark

Thursday, March 25, 2010

The Bible vs. Joseph Smith




Last night I watched the new release from Sourceflix called The Bible vs. Joseph Smith. It was beautiful and powerful documentary that follows the conversation between Christian Joel Kramer and Mormon Greg Gifford while in Israel. From their conversation about the prophecies given in the Bible and the Book of Mormon, we hear from archeologists (not all of which are Christian) and are taken to the actual sites where the biblical reliability was verified and places talked about in the prophecies.

The best part of the documentary for me was the simple demonstration that Deut 18:20-22 says that we can know if a prophet is speaking from God based on if the thing that he says will happen, does in fact happen. If that prophesy does not come true, then the prophet is to be killed. The prophet Nephi in the Book of Mormon prophesies in 1 Nephi 13:26-29 that after the time of the 12 apostles, the Bible will become corrupted, with many "plain and precious things" removed. This prophecy was given around 600 B.C. by the prophet Nephi. The documentary then shows the caves from which the Dead Sea Scrolls came and explains that this record of the Old Testament from 1000 B.C. is nearly identical to the Old Testament we have today. Further implication occurs when Joseph Smith produces the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible (JST) or Inspired version of the Bible with the intent of repairing the missing text of the Bible by adding back what was lost. According to the LDS.org website,
The Joseph Smith Translation has restored some of the plain and precious things that have been lost from the Bible (1 Ne. 13).
Some of the JST passages can be seen here and many are footnoted in the official LDS Bible. The New Testament reliability is demonstrated in the documentary as well. The conclusion is clear. Nephi is a false prophet and Joseph is caught in the lie as well.

I also thought it was valuable to actually see the undeveloped plot of land in Independence, Missouri where Joseph Smith prophesied that a temple would be built (D&C Section 84) in the generation of people present in 1832.

Overall, the documentary is very well done and would be a great way to show the strength of the biblical reliability with any LDS family and friends brave enough to watch and then discuss if the Mormon prophets pass the Deut 18:20-22 test.

If you are a Mormon, email Sourceflix at contact@sourceflix.com and they will set you up to watch The Bible vs. Joseph Smith online for free.
Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Fully Swallowed Up By Life

As a fairly new Christian, I had not yet, before this last weekend, gone through the experience of the death of a member of the body of Christ. This family friend died of cancer. I knew his time was short, and although I wanted to somehow let him know how much I have appreciated his life in the final few days before he departed, I was not able to even visit. For that reason, and because I will not see him while I remain alive, I have grieved. But, it has been amazing to me the realize the peace. This is the first time I have lost someone I care for, knowing that they are now in a place of beauty, love, and joy like we can not approach here on Earth. What a blessing to me was this brother in Christ! What a blessing to me that he is now with Christ, whole and pain-free.

As God does, He gave me this video at the time I wanted to hear it. Perhaps someone else would like it as well.


Share/Bookmark

Monday, March 22, 2010

PleaseConvinceMe Podcast 144

A Christian Perspective Regarding the Recently Passed Health Care Bill

As Christians, should we support legislation such as the recently passed Health Care Reform Bill? Are there any over-arching Christian principles that should be considered when we examine legislation of this nature? In this podcast, Jim examines five Christian principles that can help us to filter legislative ideas through a Christian Worldview. Jim also answers an email about the Milgram Experiment, and an email about the difficulty we sometimes have trying to obey God's command to honor our father and mother.

Check out the podcast homepage for subscription information and archives.


Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

The Trinity and the Gospel


Talking with a coworker about the Trinity and why it is important, I mentioned that it effects our relationship and worship of God. Practically, denial of the Trinity always diminishes Christ. Staci's post on the Mormon Gospel reminded me of this quote by James White from his book, The Forgotten Trinity,
The Gospel is the means by which the Father, in eternal love and mercy saves men through the redeeming work of the Son, Jesus Christ, and draws them to himself by the power and regenerating work of the Spirit. The Gospel, as it is proclaimed in Scripture, is Trinitarian. Remove the Father and you have no Gospel. Remove the Son, and the Gospel ceases to exists. Remove the Spirit, and the Gospel has no existence. There is no separating the work of the triune God in salvation from the truth of the Trinity itself.

Look at the "gospel" message of every single group that denies the doctrine of the Trinity. You will find error and perversion in every group. Why? Because the true Gospel must be based upon the work of the one true and triune God. Without that basis, the Gospel cannot stand. Look at Mormonism, which denies the pillar of monotheism: the Gospel becomes the means to becoming a god. Look at the Witnesses: the Gospel is a mere appendage, a message of how we can live forever in a paradise earth. Such is what happens when the Redeemer becomes Michael the Archangel, and the Spirit becomes an impersonal active force. And in the Oneness groups the Gospel becomes legalism, replete with "necessary" things one must "experience" to be truly saved.

Just as the Trinity requires us to be balanced and thorough in our reliance upon the Scriptures, so the Gospel demands the same care. The two go hand in hand, and it seems that those who lack clarity on the one inevitably end up in error on the other.

Share/Bookmark

Monday, March 15, 2010

PleaseConvinceMe Podcast 143

Theism is the Best Explanation (Part 2)

In this podcast, Jim completes a two part series in abductive reasoning as he examines five additional pieces of evidence in the universe. The process of abduction can help us to make sense of the evidence as we compare the explanations that are offered by philosophical naturalism and theism. Which system best accounts for what we see in the universe and in our own lives? Jim also answers listener email about the nature of evidence and the reliability of the scripture.

Check out the podcast homepage for subscription information and archives.


Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, March 09, 2010

New PleaseConvinceMe Radio Interviews with Jim

Talking About Youth Ministry and the Apologetics Study Bible

Paul Edwards from FaithTalk1500 WLQV interviewed Jim on the Paul Edwards Show (The Center for the Study of God and Culture) about the challenges facing young people and youth pastors and the new Apologetics Study Bible for Students.

Talking About the Need for a Reasonable Faith

John Hall and Kathy Emmons from WORD FM 101.5 interviewed Jim on the John and Kathy Show about the inclination we often have as Christians to live an "unexamined" Christian life. What is the role of the mind in the life of the Christian? Is a "blind faith" a more nobel faith?

Listen to the interviews and then leave your comments and interact with other listeners here.

Check out the PleaseConvinceMe Radio homepage for all of Jim's recent radio interviews.


Share/Bookmark

Monday, March 08, 2010

PleaseConvinceMe Podcast 142

Theism is the Best Explanation (Part 1)

In this podcast, Jim begins a two part series in abductive reasoning as he examines the first five (of ten) pieces of evidence in the universe and evaluates the explanatory power of philosophical naturalism versus that of theism. Jim also answers listener email and discusses the role that empiricism and authority play in determining truth.

Check out the podcast homepage for subscription information and archives.


Share/Bookmark

Saturday, March 06, 2010

Feeling Persecuted for Your Beliefs?


Share/Bookmark

Monday, March 01, 2010

PleaseConvinceMe Podcast 141

An Interview with Sean McDowell

In this podcast, Jim interviews apologist, author and national conference speaker Sean McDowell about his recent debate with Jim Corbett, "Is God the Best Explanation for Moral Values?" What role does preparation play in the life of Christians? How are we to conduct ourselves when our opposition is less than kind, and what strategies can we employ to reflect the compassion of Jesus while affirming the truth of God? Are debates a constructive way to proclaim the truth of the Christian Worldview?

Check out the podcast homepage for subscription information and archives.


Share/Bookmark