Advocates
of same-sex marriage argue that legalizing this form of matrimony is a matter
of social justice. They claim that human rights are being denied to a select
minority within our country. Both of these claims are true, but advocates of
same-sex marriage have the wrong minority group in view.
Same
Sex Marriage IS a matter of social justice and the protection of human rights,
but the rights that must be protected are the rights of children, not the
rights of those who want their same sex marriages to be legally recognized (and
promoted) by the government.
From
a Christian perspective, traditional marriage is a reflection of God’s design
for the family. We recognize this design through simple observation. Families
grow through sexual reproduction and this process is made possible because men
and women are designed for one another. But even those who reject a Christian
worldview on this topic are coming to realize that there is something special
about the nature of male / female unions related to families and child rearing.
Children Flourish Best When Raised By Their Biological Parents
Study
after study confirms this fact. While other forms of family (loving single
parent families, adoptive families, blended families or homosexual families)
are also capable of raising children well, statistics continue to demonstrate
what we already know intuitively: kids do best (by every relevant form of
measurement) when they are raised by the mother and father who conceived them.
Most recently, the Child Trends 2002 Research Brief, the 2012 study of Mark Regnerus and the 2012 study of Loren Marks have confirmed what seems to be an
intuitive reality. Kids will always do best (in every important area of
development) when raised by their own two biological parents in a low conflict
setting.
Children Are Less Likely to Go to Jail When Raised By Their Biological Parents
Studies
have been conducted for years demonstrating that the rate of incarceration in
young men is directly related to “lack of dad”. When boys are raised without
the guidance of their biological fathers, they are far more likely to get into
trouble and end up in jail. I saw this firsthand as a gang detail officer. The
only common denominator for all of the gangsters I arrested over the course of
two years was the fact that they all suffered from “lack of dad”. This presents
an important reality for same sex lesbian families. Women simply cannot teach
boys how to be men. While I realize this may sound harsh or judgmental, I have
seen it repeatedly in my own work.
Children are Less Likely to Get Pregnant When Raised By Their Biological Parents
Girls
also suffer when their biological fathers are not involved in their upbringing.
Studies repeatedly find that girls are far more likely to get pregnant as
teenagers when their biological fathers are not involved after the age of six.
It appears that father’s play an important role in teaching young girls how
they ought to be treated by the men in their lives. Once again, family units
that don’t include a biological father will struggle to offer what only fathers
can.
While
we’ve focused on studies that feature the importance of fathers, the unique
contributions of mother are, of course, no less important. Each parent offers
something that the other cannot, and much of this is related to distinctive
characteristics that are a part of each parent’s sexuality. Two men cannot
offer the distinct love of a mother any more than two women can offer the
distinct guidance of a father. Is that really so controversial?
Children Are Less Likely to Be Poor When Raised By Their Biological Parents
Recent studies have also demonstrated that long-term marriages provide children with
the best opportunity to avoid a life of poverty. For the past two generations,
the primary factor that has determined one’s level of poverty was whether or he
or she was raised in a two parent, stable, unbroken marriage. When this truth
is coupled with statistics related to the flourishing of children in two
biological parent, low conflict families, the conclusions are obvious.
Traditional Marriage Is A Matter of Social Justice
It’s
time for all of us to recognize that the case for traditional marriage is
really the case for protecting the rights of an important minority group:
children. It’s a matter of social justice. Even the United Nations recognizes
that every child has the right (as much as is humanly possible) to be raised by
his or her own biological parents. When we promote forms of marriage that are
contrary to this human right, we deprive children of the best opportunity to
thrive, avoid incarceration, teenage pregnancy and poverty.
Promoting for the Larger Group, While Permitting for the Smaller Group
Government
prohibits, permits or promotes certain behaviors. The number of children being
raised in our country vastly outnumbers the number of homosexuals who want
their unions to be recognized as legal marriages. While government can certainly
permit same sex relationships and respect everyone’s right to love whomever
they want, government has a duty to promote those family relationships that
protect the rights of children. We simply must choose between two worthy goals while
honoring children who seldom have a voice in this matter.
To hear more about this issue, check out the latest PleaseConvinceMe Podcast.

3 comments:
Shouldn't this be an argument for why homosexual couples should not be able to adopt children? I would still disagree, but I don't see what the "better for the children" argument has to do with gay people getting married.
I wholeheartedly agree with Eric Burton; this is a matter of gay adoption, not gay marriage per se. Nevermind that Mark Regnerus' study compared *stable* heterosexual couples to just anyone who was both a parent and engaged in homosexual behavior. Further, it is obviously not always possible (or best) for a child to be raised by his or her biological parents.
I don't know why homosexuals want marriage anyway? Marriage is monogamous, it's a commitment to the person to the exclusion of all others. The simple fact is that the vast majority of homosexual relationship are not monogamous. Are they really sure they want "marriage"??? They already have the same rights as other couples. Why would they want to then go down the monogamous route when the vast majority of them don't even want that?
Post a Comment