Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Apathy, Atheism, and the Absurdity of Life Without God


Here is a truth I wish everyone would take the time to earnestly and honestly contemplate:

If God does not exist and there is no life after death, then there is no ultimate meaning, value, or purpose in life.

The question of God’s existence is the most important question we can seek to answer. If God does not exist and we do not survive the death of our bodies, life is ultimately absurd. J.P. Moreland provides an illustration which helps bring this truth home:

Suppose I invited you over to my house to play a game of Monopoly. When you arrive I announce that the game is going to be a bit different. Before us is the Monopoly board, a set of jacks, a coin, the television remote, and a refrigerator in the corner of the room. I grant you the first turn, and puzzlingly, inform you that you may do anything you want: fill the board with hotels, throw the coin in the air, toss a few jacks, fix a sandwich, or turn on the television. You respond by putting hotels all over the board and smugly sit back as I take my turn. I respond by dumping the board upside down and tossing the coin in the air. Somewhat annoyed, you right the board and replenish it with hotels. I turn on the television and dump the board over again.

Now it wouldn’t take too many cycles of this nonsense to recognize that it didn’t really matter what you did with your turn, and here’s why. There is no goal, no purpose to the game we are playing. Our successive turns form a series of one meaningless event after another. Why? Because if the game as a whole has no purpose, the individual moves within the game are pointless. Conversely, only a game’s actual purpose according to its inventor can give the individual moves significance.[1]

As Moreland articulates, if the game of Monopoly as a whole has no purpose, the individual moves within the game have no meaning or value. The only way your moves within the game of Monopoly have significance is if you discover the purpose of the game and you align yourself with that purpose.

As it is with Monopoly, so it is with life. Like the game of Monopoly, the only way our individual lives have any ultimate meaning or value is if life has purpose behind it, and real purpose requires both God and life after death.

To help think about this, let us suppose that God does not exist. In an atheistic scenario, we as human beings are simply Johnny-come-lately biological accidents on an insignificant speck of dust we call Earth which is hurtling through empty space in a meaningless and random universe that will eventually die a cold heat death. In the big scheme of things, we are no more significant than a swarm of mosquitoes. In a universe where there is no God and no afterlife, our actions are meaningless and serve no final end because ultimately each one of us, along with everyone we know and influence, will die and enter oblivion. Mention of morality is an incoherent babbling; there is no difference between living the life of a saint or a sociopath, no difference between a Mother Theresa and an Adolf Hitler. William Lane Craig frequently refers to this as “the absurdity of life without God.”[2] He states,

Without God the universe is the result of a cosmic accident, a chance explosion. There is no reason for which it exists. As for man, he’s a freak of nature—a blind product of matter plus time plus chance. If God does not exist, then you are just a miscarriage of nature, thrust into a purposeless universe to live a purposeless life…the end of everything is death…In short, life is utterly without reason…Unfortunately, most people don’t realize this fact. They continue on as though nothing has changed.[3]

The Cure for Apathy?

It seems to me that any sensible person who honestly reflects on the absurdity of life without God cannot at the same time remain apathetic toward the question of God’s existence. God’s existence matters and has tremendous implications for our own existence. Life’s absurdity without God should bother us. It should keep us awake at night. It should jar us out of our apathetic attitude toward ultimate issues. Unfortunately this is often not the case, especially in our information age where it is far too easy to remain distracted and caught up in the daily busyness of life. I am often amazed how so many people can simply go on day to day without ever giving a second thought to the most important questions in life.

But if we want to be intellectually honest, and if we are at all concerned with real meaning, value, and purpose, the question of God’s existence demands our attention. We ignore this topic and remain apathetic to it only to our own peril. As Brian Auten has stated, “the wise man seeks God.”[4] For the reasonable person, reflection on the absurdity of life without God should be enough to extinguish any remaining apathy regarding the question of God’s existence.

Perhaps then, apathy (or apatheism) is not something that can be changed directly, i.e., it is not something that can simply be willed away through direct effort. Rather, like our other beliefs, apathy must be changed indirectly. If apatheism is the belief that “the existence of God is not meaningful or relevant to my life,” perhaps reflecting on the absurdity of life without God will be powerful enough to indirectly change apathetic beliefs and help communicate the importance of taking God and other ultimate issues seriously.

The Inconsistent Atheist

I have never met an atheist who lives consistently with the implications of his naturalistic worldview. Though he rejects both God and life after death, he continues to live his life as if his actions have real ultimate meaning, value, and purpose. As Craig stated above, “they continue on as though nothing has changed.” Atheists reject God but still desire meaning, value, and purpose in life, so they indubitably find something to give their devotion to, be it themselves, family, money, pleasure, education, work, social causes, or politics. But neither do any of these subjective pursuits have ultimate significance or objective value in a world without God. In the end, the atheist must borrow from the Christian worldview in order to infuse their own life and actions with meaning and purpose. This is because atheism and the naturalistic worldview offers no hope and provides no grounding for significance and value. Ken Samples states,

Naturalism as a worldview seems unable to offer the kind of meaning, purpose, and hope that humans require and yearn to experience. Instead, the ultimate fate of the individual, humanity, and even the universe will inevitably be the same regardless of what any person may do. Nothing that anyone thinks, says, or does will change the fact that each individual person, all of humankind collectively, and the universe itself (due to entropy) will someday be utterly extinct, lifeless, and cold. The outcome of naturalism is an inevitable hopelessness.[5]

In other words, naturalism fails the existential test. Honest atheists cannot live happily and consistently with their worldview. It has nothing to offer but depression, despair, and dejection. Christianity on the other hand succeeds exactly where atheism fails:

Biblical Christianity therefore provides the two conditions necessary for a meaningful, valuable, and purposeful life: God and immortality. Because of this, we can live consistently and happily within the framework of our worldview. Thus, biblical Christianity succeeds precisely where atheism breaks down…Therefore, it makes a huge difference whether God exists.[6]

Conclusion

Jesus said, “This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent…and for this I have come into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears my voice” (John 17:3, 18:37).

Real meaning, value, and purpose comes from knowing God and making God known. But it isn’t enough to simply understand this purpose and assent to its truth. In order for our individual lives to have real significance we need to willfully align ourselves with this truth, and that means aligning ourselves with Jesus Christ, the author and perfecter of our faith (Heb. 12:2).


[1] J.P. Moreland, The God Question: An Invitation to a Life of Meaning (Eugene: Harvest House, 2009), 34-35.
[2] See William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd ed. (Wheaton: Crossway, 2008), chapter 2, and On Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision (Colorado Springs: David C. Cook, 2010), chapter 2.
[3] Craig, On Guard, 37.
[4] See his essay “The Wise Man Seeks God” available at http://www.apologetics315.com/2010/05/essay-wise-man-seeks-god-by-brian-auten.html.
[5] Kenneth Richard Samples, A World of Difference: Putting Christian Truth-Claims to the Worldview Test (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2007), 217.
[6] Craig, On Guard, 49-50 (his italics).

Share/Bookmark

11 comments:

Werner Botha said...

Sorry to break it to you, but there is no evidence of a god. The bible says god can see into the future. If so, before he created the devil, he would already have known what the devil was going to cause, ie. all the misery: death, murder, rape, war, famine etc. in the world. Think carefully about it. Does it make sense?...
There is no way anyone can argue that one away. And that is only one of many points of illogic.

ispburger said...

I think that for the sake of argument, you can stop one short of God. A life without ultimate meaning is absurd, and atheism denies that ultimate meaning. Aldous Huxley wrote about that. For the theist, the answer is obvious, ultimate meaning is to be found in the creator, but there might be other alternatives. Just none that we know of yet...

Thesauros said...

"Sorry to break it to you, but there is no evidence of a god"

You mean other than a mathematically precise, life supporting, moral universe? A material universe that came into being out of literally nothing, a material universe that could not have had a material cause because nothing material existed until Big Bang.

ispburger said...

"If so, before he created the devil..."

Foreknown is foreordained, right? But does the concept of foreknowledge make any sense prior to creation (fully understanding that "prior" makes no sense either). Assuming that all creation (and rebellion against the creator) happens in the eternal "now", and without free-will being sacrificed, is it logically possible for God to have "foreknown" this?

This also does not necessarily affect omnipotence, because omnipotence only means the ability to do all things that are logically doable.

Werner Botha said...

So what is this 'ultimate meaning'?
And how does one find it in the creator?

And the argument of a creator makes more sense compared to the big bang theory? Does the fact that the big bang theory maybe, does not make sense to you, make it impossible? Or is the only alternative a 'god' for you?

If god created everything then there must have been nothing at some "prior" point, except god himself only. But then there couldn't have been nothing because there was a god?! But was he god then? A god is a deity whom is being worshiped, but he had no subjects!?

If it was not "logically possible for god to have known this" then we cannot use the word almighty and god in the same sentence, can we?
Almighty supersedes all, even logic.

OK, Look,
Life without god is absurd for YOU.
Atheism is absurd for YOU.
I do not believe apathy has anything to do with Atheism.

And yes, logic does rule my world, and i'm not unhappy. Life has all the meaning to me that i need.
You cannot be happy without god. I can.

Thesauros said...

"Foreknown is foreordained, right?"
No
=====
So what is this 'ultimate meaning'?"
I think it means that what we do counts for eternity. That what happens to us takes place within a context, that it is not without purpose.
-----
And the argument of a creator makes more sense compared to the big bang theory?"
Without a Creator, there would not be any Big Bang creation event.
-----
there must have been nothing at some "prior" point"
There must have been nothing MATERIAL at some "prior" point.
========

zilch said...

Foreknown is foreordained if you're God, and thus omnipotent and omniscient. If you created the Universe knowing beforehand exactly what would happen (omniscience), and created it in exactly such a way that everything would happen exactly as you knew it would (omnipotence), then it's illogical to say that God did not foreordain everything.

The whole of the Universe, from beginning to end, is laid out like a cartoon to an omniscient God before it even begins, and if He's omnipotent, then He can make every singly frame exactly how He wants. So if there is evil in the world, God is responsible, just as He is responsible for good. Free will is meaningless in a cartoon.

Thesauros said...

But He doesn't manipulate every frame of the cartoon the way He wants. We chose to bring sin into the world and God has allowed history to unfold within that context. Knowing how it will end is not the same as causing that end.

Knowing that someone will reject His offer of salvation is not the same as causing that rejection.

Suppose I bake a pie and set it on the counter. I know that if my son eats the whole pie he won't feel very good afterwards. Knowing this isn't the same as forcing him to eat the whole pie. Our free will can be used for good or evil.

zilch said...

Your analogy fails, thesauros, because you are merely your son's father, not his omniscient omnipotent Creator. You did not know your son's thoughts before he was born, and you did not create him in just such a way that he would think these thoughts.

You must either give up God's omnipotence and omniscience, or our free will: the two are incompatible.

Thesauros said...

Well, then I guess we disagree. Good luck with the choice you've made.

zilch said...

And good luck with your choice, thesauros. I don't really care what people believe, as long as they behave nicely. If it takes belief in a god to behave nicely, that's okay.

If you're ever in Vienna, or in the SF Bay Area most summers, drop me a line, and lunch is on me.

cheers from foggy Austria, zilch